.

Edward Brooke, African-Americans and the GOP

Edward Brooke, the first popularly elected African-American US Senator, was a Republican, and his principles on freedom, race, and politics remain a mainstay in the GOP to this day.

Edward Brooke was the first popularly elected African-American US Senator, and a Republican. Brooke defeated an incumbent Democrat for the Senate seat in 1966, a watershed year for Republicans. He represented Massachusetts from 1966 to 1978, even though today Massachusetts has very few high-ranking Republicans in office.

Brooke's legacy as a loyal Republican exposes the "dark vein of ignorance" in former General Colin Powell's remark on "Face the Nation" about minorities and the Republican Party. The insights and the legacy of this former Attorney General and US Senator give a better glimpse into the truth, too long ignored and distorted, of the Republican Party, a story which more African-Americans deserve to know and believe, and thus feel welcome in the GOP.

In a telling interview about his history in politics, Brooke shared why he was a Republican. He won the Republican party's nomination for office, not the Democrat's, in Massachusetts. He favored the GOP because they had desegregated the Massachusetts National Guard. The GOP was more progressive on civil rights. They also rejected the media-hounding of McCarthyism. His account highlights that Republicans have been progressive on civil rights and women's rights long before the Democratic Party. The first female Congressperson, Jeannette Rankin, was a Republican, too.

"I have always believed a man or a woman should do what he can do for himself", Brooke shared, a central tenet of individual liberty. He added that the party must recognize that  people cannot do some things for themselves. Not once has the Republican Party neglected the needs of the most needy, but government intervention on taxpayer dime does not do the most good, often times. "I don't like huge government", Brooke signaled, a consistent conservative stance of the GOP in general. An independent problem-solver, not an ideologue, Brooke was one of first Republicans in Washington to ask President Nixon to resign in the wake of the Watergate Scandal.

Regarding the vast majority of blacks as Democrats, Brooke commented that he never isolated myself from black politicians. "I believe that most blacks are Democrats because they represent Democratic districts". The culture of those constituencies is the definitive issue, not race—more likely because of Democratic dominance in urban areas, a demographic which Republicans need to focus on more.

On winning the senate seat, Brooke shared that the Massachusetts Governor also wanted to run in 1966, as did many other Republicans, but Brooke had established a community network of support, and thus he had the most powerful political organization in the state. Brooke's previous record of public service included his leadership role in the Boston Strangler case, still ongoing, as the Attorney General who brought together the rest of the state's district attorneys. His savvy on community connections is much needed in the GOP today. Humble and appreciative, Brooke praised his staff of young lawyers and investigators, plus the faith and the confidence of the Massachusetts voters.

Brooke's tenure also saved the the state millions of dollars, a resume of trust with the public trust, which is so essential to Republicans, not Democrats. "You can believe in Brooke!" was his campaign slogan. Where did this confidence come from? The very party that nominated him for the senate had never denied him a nomination before. "Eight times I went to them [the GOP], eight times I won the nomination, even when I won the bitter primary fight in 1978." It's the Republican Party, not the Democratic Party, that supported the first popularly-elected African-American US Senator.

About race, Brooke stated clearly that it was not an issue to him. He lived out the dream that Dr. Martin Luther King preached about. He was willing to reach out to Democrats, but he did not want to be elected because of his skin. He wanted the vote because voters believed that he could do the job better than the other candidate. He never succumbed to a "reality" that race was a defining mater. "I was not talking [to voters] as a white man, I was not talking as a black man. I was talking as a man."

To young black people, Brooke stressed the importance of a work ethic. "There are no shortcuts to glory, no frills and ruffles, no shortcuts to success." Republicans support and rejoice when people get on their feet and run, rather than sit and depend, a mentality pervasive among Democratic leaders.

Rejecting the fearful advice of his grandmother to "remember his place" as a black man, Brooke tells African-American youth:

"You're place is anywhere you want it to be. It's left up to you. You make that decision."

The Democratic Party tells men and women their place, their value, based on race. In the Republican Party, minorities get to choose their place. While Democrats in the South were telling blacks to sit in the back of the bus, Republicans then and now invite African-Americans to the front, and if they choose, they can own the bus, because free markets make free people, and free people prosper in free enterprise.

The legacy of Edward Brooke represents the true stance of the GOP and African-Americans.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Hoboken Ono February 24, 2013 at 02:56 AM
Arthur Christopher Schaper is a life-long resident of the South Bay (California). He currently lives in Torrance, California. He is a teacher and a writer whose letters and editorials have appeared locally as well as nationally, including the Daily Breeze, the Los Angeles Jewish Observer, and even papers in New Jersey and Massachusetts.
Racer X February 24, 2013 at 01:03 PM
Edward Brooke had an good head on his shoulders. He was a damn good American. Why do we have to differentiate race by referring to some Americans as African and some not? I feel that you are either an American, or not. We are all on the same side, or should be.
Paul L. Dragu February 24, 2013 at 02:36 PM
I think it safe to say that those with a combination of informative intelligence, and a spirit of can-do usually find themselves voting Republican over democrat. Thomas Sowell- a black conservative economist- said it best; the Democratic party wants to help poor people. Republicans want to help poor people not be poor. As a voter and citizen, I don't understand how the black constituency can simply ignore what the welfare state and the Obama administration has done to your unemployment, crime, education, and family structure. Go to the DOJ for stats. Go to any gov't site and you'll find the startling facts. How does one keep voting for an entity that has perpetuated poverty? It's beyond me.
Racer X February 24, 2013 at 04:28 PM
Paul- I agree. It really is a crime. Americans have evolved away from slavery, yet no one calls the government on what continues to keep much of our poor population in chains. The winners, no matter who they are, are the ones who choose to break away and realize that equal rights and equal responsibility go hand in hand.
Arthur Christopher Schaper February 26, 2013 at 10:51 PM
Great responses all around. Thanks again, everyone!
Tammy Osier February 27, 2013 at 12:06 AM
Here's a good read by thomas Sowell concerning the hurry to get a black man in the white house and how we did it for all the wrong reasons and ended up with a very wrong person. http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2008/04/29/an_old_newness/page/full/ Here's an excerpt: He uses a baseball analogy of a great hitter named Paul Waner who was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits -- one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach. Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top. The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000. To be continued...
Tammy Osier February 27, 2013 at 12:12 AM
After reading this last excerpt- read the whol thing. It's fantastic. "Many people seem to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen. Barack Obama has already indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults. Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of "change" endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually everything has says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s. Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not -- all this is a re-run of the 1960s."
Racer X February 27, 2013 at 12:33 AM
Tammy- That is a very good article. Every time I think about the fact that we have a President named Barrack Hussein Obama, I just shudder in disbelief.
Tammy Osier February 27, 2013 at 12:51 AM
BHO has not only not had a post racial presidency, he has stirred up o much anger and distension that it has set us back for years. The progress we've made seems almost to have been for nothing. Just think what a herman cain presidency would have been like. Like someone said quoting thomas Sowell, "the Democratic party wants to help poor people. Republicans want to help poor people not be poor." Wiser words have yet to be spoken .
Arthur Christopher Schaper February 27, 2013 at 12:52 AM
Not even four more years. The GOP has a great line of candidates for 2016! Do not forget 2014 -- get the word out. Now that Romney is not at the top of the ticket, GOP should do A-OK! Chambliss served his state and his country. I hope that the next Georgian will deliver.
K Wade February 27, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Yeah..the GOP is so strong! :/
Tammy Osier February 27, 2013 at 11:28 AM
Well, hopefully, the difference is that when the gop messes up, they learn from it. Some of the young candidates seem not to compromise and stand up to the opposing party as well as theri own. GOP has some piccadillos that we need to get shed of. GOP'er cave into democrats so much that I see them as a dog wit hits tail between its legs. Sooner or later we'll get another Reagan and then hopefully healfrom this idiocy we've called a party for the last 6 or so years.
Racer X February 27, 2013 at 04:51 PM
Frankly, I am not a big fan of either party. We need something different. A party that encompasses the 70% in the middle. I am tired of people having to align themselves with the 15% at either end.
Arthur Christopher Schaper February 27, 2013 at 06:52 PM
Kind of like. . .Edward Brooke!
Racer X February 27, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Bingo.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something