patching...
Update: Get Barrow Patch news in your inbox each day by subscribing to our free newsletter »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Is New Immigration Policy Constitutional?

On Friday, the Obama Administration changed the immigration policy to essentially grant immunity to some illegal immigrants, but some in Congress are already threatening to challenge it.

 

On Friday, President Barack Obama announced that under certain conditions the country would stop deporting children who were brought to the United States illegally before the age of 16. The move essentially grants immunity, without granting a path to citizenship, for a reported 800,000 people. 

But there are many in Congress who have spoken out against it, saying the move itself was illegal under the U.S. system and cannot stand. In a press release, U.S. Rep. Rob Woodall (R-GA-07) issued the following statement.

“America is a beacon of freedom in the world and it is no wonder that hundreds of thousands of people each year apply to complete the legal and proper steps to become citizens or permanent residents of this amazing land.  After all, who wouldn’t want to raise their family in the land of opportunity and under the rule of law?  Unfortunately, President Obama’s decision to cease the deportation of potentially millions of illegal immigrants and instead grant them legal work permits—while millions of legal U.S. residents remain unemployed and unable to find work—undermines both the rule of law and the economic opportunity that is America.”

“As of 2011, more than 13.7 million U.S. citizens were unemployed, and today our national unemployment levels remain disappointingly high at 8.2 percent.  How can the President and his Administration offer the few American jobs that are available to those who have come to America illegally rather than those U.S. citizens who have always paid their taxes and played by the rules?”

“With today’s decree, President Obama demonstrates the same contempt for America’s laws that those who enter illegally do.  He is undermining the balance of power laid out by the U.S. Constitution, going far beyond his power within the Executive Branch and advancing his election-year politics at the expense of the American economy and the American people’s trust.”

“I am tremendously proud of America’s history as a nation of immigrants, and I am committed to continuing and improving the legal avenues that allow another generation of legal immigrants to become U.S. citizens.  But, as every new American citizen knows, we are a nation of laws, and the U.S. Constitution extends lawmaking power to Congress and Congress alone.  This executive power grab—whether proposed by President Obama, President Romney, or President Reagan—is an unconstitutional act, and I will fight it with every tool at my disposal.”

Do you think this new order is Constitutional and can it withstand a legal challenge?

Related Topics: Immigration

jm fay

9:49 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012

How can it be constitutional? He is picking and chosing what laws are followed, enforced and on who. American citizens dont get that same choice.

We live in CO. Our legislature has 6 times defeated in state tuition for illegals. One of our colleges decided to do it through their board of trustees 2 weeks ago starting this fall. That means each illegal saves $4534 per semester if its allowed to stand though the AG is now reviewing it as CO has in its constitution; no state benefits to illegals. Thank God he is an R so it should be ruled unconstitutional.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dr Richard Stafford

3:05 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

ALL undocumented rsidents in US pay the exacy same Sales Tax as do legal residents. ALL undocumented residents pay exact same percentage of property taxes (for public schools and hospitals) through their montly rental payments on apartments/rent houses, NO ONE is exempt from property taxes in the US and the land lord or owner uses hosuing rental payments to make property taxes every December. MOST illegal immigarnts pay state and federal taxes through ITIN numbers that replace SS numbers. There are NOT 11 million day laborers working in the US in front of Lowes or Home Depot. Most have jobs with businesses, companies, corporations or farming operations and pay fedewral and state taxes, medicare, and Social Security. Just ask to see their monthly pay cehcks and you'll see. If these people left, you and I would see about a 20% decrease in all tax roles. Be Happy! Please see my adopted son's incredible story and then perhaps you might sing a different tune.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2QBQ8u631U
Dr. Stafford

Comment_arrow

jm fay

3:47 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Dr Stafford:

1. CO does not allow illegals to get drivers licenses or register your car. That is part of the fees; CO residents pay to be part of our great state and the reason we deserve in state after we are here at least 1 year.

2. They dont when they are independent contractors and if they do; its alot less taxes they they should be paying. We pay the full 15.3 % SS taxes and the full medicare because the IRS comes after us.

3. Why are alot of hospitals closing down in high immigrants areas (LA comes to mind) if it wasnt due to the billions they spend on services to them; most of which arent reimbused? Some hospitals are also non profit so they pay no property taxes.

4. Sales taxes pays only a portion in areas where the tax is. In some parts of CO; there is no sales tax or if there is; its for a specific use (where we live thats open space and nothing else.) Denver, Aurora and other cities, etc have had to cut back on alot of services as this revenue is down and they have a lot property tax bases. Our library, fire, school, and tother districts dont get any of these taxes; just property and on our car registration fees.

There are too many people out of work who have the right to be here. There are plenty of legal residents / citizens who work in the same industries and are paid less and or lose hours due to illegals.

No thank you. Nothing will change our mind on this.

Patch_comments_icon

Kristi Reed

11:09 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012

There are some issues which really should be handled through legislation and not through executive orders.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

11:37 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012

This is a tactical move on BHO's part. By the time any court challenge could be made to this the election will be over. The President doesn't have a record to run on so he has to run on something else. Can't wait to see what comes next.

BTW...the picture you used of the D3 debate perfectly caught my bald spot...You and Damion both captured it from different angles...thanks loads! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

10:14 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

There is no executive order here.

Tammy Osier

11:14 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012

JM - it would be a good idea if it weren't so obviously a power grab for votes. Why do you think he won't go through congress? The rule of law has meant nothing to this president. There's a place for executive orders (time of war maybe?), but he has a thing for abusing power. We do need a good comprehensive overhaul of immigration policy, but it needs to go through proper channels.
Immigration reform is a long overdue thing to be looked at. If Rubio becomes Romney's VP, he has many good ideas and personal experience to draw from.
Right now, anything we do should be viewed through the eyes of how it will affect our economy, not how it will bolster the voting rolls.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jm fay

3:56 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Ma'am:

Not in this economy. 5 years of a hard recession; no end in sight; millions went from middle income to poverty, 24 million out of work or needing more hours.

We do not believe immigration reform without full enforcement and sealing the borders including visa overstays will work. We allow in 2 million new legal immigrants per year; plus all the kids of illegals born here and we are not creating enough jobs just for these people much less the 24 million. We were lied to in 1986 and we dont need to be lied to again.

Rubio wants a watered down version of the Dream Act so we wouldnt want him for VP.

We dont like Obama or Romney. Intended to vote for none of the above but may have to change our mind to get rid of Obama; not that Romney with his tepid response to this is a lot better.

By the way; we dont believe its 800000 only; its more like millions getting amnesty while millions of Americans want to work; need to work and what are we; something to be thrown away when something / some one new comes along? Do you expect us to live on the streets when we exhaust our savings, our friends, etc so we can help illegals?

John B

2:47 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Pure and simple pandering............

Reply

Dr Richard Stafford

3:09 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Republican President Ronald Reagan gave 3 million Hispanics citizenship in 1982. I suppose a Democratic presdient can do something far less 30 years later with Republicans goinjg crazy. Uhm, maybe Republicans just say NO, because Obama is not a Republican? Why didn't the current complainers ...complain when Presdient Reagan went much further for the undocumented in 1982?

Reply
Comment_arrow

jm fay

3:57 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

All the facts didnt come out then and we were told that we would have enforcement and we never got that. The American people cant be fooled twice. Amnesty is bad for everyone but the illegals.

Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

7:05 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Sorry sir but this is the wrong answer delivered for the wrong reasons. Obama did it soley for political purposes. He is desperate for any vote anywhere. That's his sole reason...the rest is just solyndra level propoganda

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

3:28 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

I'm perfectly in agreement that this is something that needed to be done - just didn't like the method - don't care if a Republican or Democrat did it. My opinion - it should be overturned and done the right way, as soon as possible. I just fear that if we give a president, any president, too much power we run the risk of heading toward a dictatorship. For one man (or woman) to decide to change the law based on their own personal vision is a problem. The correct way is by negotiation through Congress for something to be acceptable to the majority of the country. That is what we elect congressmen for - we don't need them otherwise. We could get by with just a president.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

5:30 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Sharon:
I agree that something needs to be done. My hearburn is I'm not convinced that it's a personal vision of Obama's, rather another late game tactic to sway the Hispanic vote as we get into the eleventh hour of the election year. Coincidental?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Rebecca McCarthy

6:32 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

The three branches of government were set up to keep each other in check. So the President does have many powers, as do the Congress and the Judiciary. I wouldn't worry about a dictatorship. I would worry about gridlock.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

11:35 pm on Sunday, June 17, 2012

@ Rebecca
That's true - once it becomes a dictatorship, you're told what to think and worrying about anything but what the state wants hasn't been on that list in the past.

flores jerik

5:21 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

U talk about illegal immigrants coming here,and taking us citizens job,how about white folks standing on the corner begging for money,because they wanna b crack heads,and lazy to work.while illegal ppl Wanadoo work for a better life,and we as illegal ppl work hard for our future and kids.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

5:36 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Flores:
Wanting a better life and working hard for the future of your kids is a good thing but not justification to supplant the immigration process. Follow the legal process and this discussion would be moot.

Comment_arrow

jm fay

10:47 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

People have free will so if they want to be crack heads, not find a job; so be it but dont expect the gov't to take care of you. The issue here is that these are our crack heads, lazy people; etc since they were born here. We dont have the money to help all 6.7 billion in the world (after we took out the 300 m here) and we have a 16 t national debt. Illegals all need to go back to their own country.

Patch_comments_icon

Rebecca McCarthy

6:14 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

This is an issue about which most people have made up their minds years ago. Nothing, no one, will change things for them.

Reply

Dr Richard Stafford

6:35 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

It intrigues me that most of the push back against President Obama's very narrow proposal to grant temporary, two year visas (not citizenship) to undocumented students is but a ti y spec when placed against Republican President Ronald Reagan's TOTAL amnesty for 3 million Hispanic adults and children in 1982, uhm, his name is shouted from the highest rafters when Republicans run for office, siding LNG side memories of him as the perfect example of Republican polices....but Virtually ALL current Republicans run for the hills at the mere mention of Reagan's great act of compassion to hard working Hispanics who process chickens, harvest and plan crops across the US, clean restaurants, roof houses in August heat, mow countless yards. Maybe it isn't about faulty memory of the Republicans greatest 20 th century, perhaps ut is about ones culture and skin color? After all, my state was the leader of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s, and once again leads the way in excluding promising young minds. Maybe it is about skin color?
Dr. Stafford

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

7:06 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

Temporary visas my foot. These temporary visas will be like a sales tax increase...once you give it the government will NEVER relinquish it. It's amnesty plain and simple.

Patch_comments_icon

Deanna Allen

6:36 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

"We do need a good comprehensive overhaul of immigration policy, but it needs to go through proper channels. Immigration reform is a long overdue thing to be looked at."

I agree with Tammy. This issue HAS to be addressed. It has been a point of contention for too long.

I am so tired of politicians not addressing real problems in America — a defense of marriage act? Really? How about we punish ADULTERERS with a prison sentence. THAT is a real defense of marriage and might get some of those idiots out of D.C. — and I'm more than annoyed by the divide between Republicans and Democrats. What I think is important is that we are AMERICANS.

I want to see my elected officials WORK. Oh, look, there's a problem/issue/situation in our country, state, city? Assess the situation objectively, call in experts, learn what might work and what probably won't, then set aside this stupid Republican/Democrat divide and vote your conscience, not your party line. Oh, wait. THAT might be the problem. Too many politicians don't appear to have consciences.

Stepping off my soapbox now and getting back to the issue of illegal immigration — the government needs to DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS. END OF STORY. Now can we please get on with it?

Reply
Comment_arrow

American Patriot

8:55 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

@ Deanna great post! Could not agree more. Love the idea about ADULTERERS. LMAO. For those of you who do not realize the trouble we are in with the baby boomers leaving the work force and the way our social system is set up like a ponzi scheme. Benefits for retirees are paid for by current workers. We are trending towards more retirees then workers. Also there needs to be people to buy the assets from the boomers as they die off. We actually need more people here. The best way to solve the issue is through comprehensive immigration reform. We need more people paying into the system. I know it won't be fair for those who came here the legal way. I am sure a compromise can be worked out through some sort fine or extra fee. No way to know what that number may be unless people start talking about it. I do hate the executive order though. Something non American about it. Both parties need to grow up and deal with this issue. We have a real demographic issue and it is not going away anytime soon. Do some research ask yourself who will buy all the homes the baby boomers have when they die. They currently own 1.2 homes and they out number the buyers 3 to 1. The issue is neither conservative or liberal. It is an American issue it it needs to be addressed.

Dr Richard Stafford

6:43 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

President Obama's act of compassion for students is NOT ab11tg hour political trick. He was upfront about it three years ago during his I agural address, and has attempted to get Athens Dream Wct passed in Congrss. It DID pass the ahi use and got 55 votes in the Senate, five short to stop a ate publican filibuster (60 votes required).
My question about this...what would Jesus say about extending a hand to people who provide so many service jobs for the rest of us?
Uhm, funny how quickly Christian. Principles vanish from the lips of the Christian far right when things like immigration, capital punishment, and forgiveness is brought up for a vote.
Oh ajesus would. E pissed at these pseudo -Christians.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

7:08 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

That's funny sir...probably wanna stop reading the Bible upside down.

Comment_arrow

John B

7:28 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

The good doctor says, "My question about this...what would Jesus say about extending a hand to people who provide so many service jobs for the rest of us?" Gee doc, not hard to see how you perceive illegal immigrants. I'm guessing Jesus would say they are not subordinate to doctors. Not sure if I were an illegal I would want you for a sounding board.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

10:26 pm on Saturday, June 16, 2012

He might say give unto GOD what is GOD's and Rome what is Rome's....

Perhaps if people would STOP trying to get the government to do the work CLEARLY assigned to the church body, we would be better off.

Comment_arrow

Old Vet

8:06 pm on Sunday, June 17, 2012

Sounds to me that you may be hiring illegals to do your yard work, house keeping. God forbid you loose your cheap labor.

Susan S

8:39 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

I heard one of the leaders of the illegals say that this was the Moral thing to do, First look up Moral and tell me that Moral and illegal can go hand in hand. If these parents brought them, it was their choice and their responsability in doing so, let them go back and come here legally. We can count their time and perhaps welcome them in the country sooner, but they still need to go back and come here legally. We have enough problems with legal Americans getting jobs and the illegals have taken many jobs like construction that many of hardworking Americans were doing for years. Like it or not illegal means against the law and the President is not representing the Constitution and the laws that it contains.

Reply

Susan S

8:41 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

By the way Jesus would say that we are to obey man's law, that's Bible. Look it up.

Reply

Xardox

9:21 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

Interesting comments.
This president swore to uphold the Constitution. He publicly announces that he will pick and choose what he will and will not uphold.
Clearly unconstitutional pandering.

Reply

Mr. Z

9:54 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

What does the legal process for citizenship entail? If we knew the details, we wouldn't be so quick to decide whether children who are brought here by their families are allowed to go to school, earn degrees and contribute to our society rather than hurt it. It sickens me that a country built on immigrants turns their backs on those seeking opportunity. Our ancestors left their birth countries, the countries they love, to seek safety and tolerance. Stop casting stones. In God we Trust.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jm fay

10:36 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

This country allows in 2 milion new legal immigrants per year. Thats one million through chain migration and another million through new non ag visas to do work like IT, engineering, etc.

Do you really think we dont have enough engineering people who need a job? IT? other high tech jobs? but no which is why so many companies fradulently use the H 1 B visa program. Met a man yesterday from Slovakia and he is working at Oracle on a 2 year project. Told us he worked in Ireland as well. Slovakia is part of the 27 EU so he can work in other countries in Europe but for him to be working in the USA as if we dont have plenty of IT people out of work is nonsense.

This country has over 300 m people in it. 12 to 20 million are illegals. Then we have all the babies born here of them each year who due to the misuse of the 14th; get automatic citizenship.

Lets do some math:

2 million per year is how many per month? 160000 +
300 to 700 k per year new borns of illegals per month 25000 to 50000 +

We created under 100000 new jobs last month. Most of the past 3 years where jobs were created is also under these figures. Lets not forget all the millions who are out of work of our own citizens and also the new immigrants we already allowed in. Who expects the unemployment rate to come down any time soon?

Your decision come November.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

11:29 pm on Sunday, June 17, 2012

We were built by and still grow by LEGAL immigrants and THEIR immigration.
Anyone in favor of what the President has just done does NOT understand that there is a CLEAR difference.

Susan S

10:31 am on Sunday, June 17, 2012

First those who came here sought citizenship. Most of those here illegally do not and continue to raise the Mexican flag and go back and forth to Mexico. I have friends that are illegal and they return to Mexico to get medicine and dental care because it is cheaper, at least that is what they are telling me. I have one family I know that only came here to make enough to buy a house in Mexico, they have three children and get peachcare, which our tax money pays for. Casting stones, no, because my ancestors came here and became Americans and Mr. Z if you check out what God says he says we are to obey man's law so don't use the in God we trust when we are talking about breaking the law. I am sorry for those who came with their parents, however we all make decisions for our children when they are young we are responsible as parents for our decisions. Now when you give an American a job who is out of work and legal that is the right thing to do. Otherwise no one illegal deserves a break when they are breaking the law and taking from those who have worked their entire lives. To do other than that is discrimination against those who are here legally. If you wanted to be a citizen seems to me you certainly would not send your money back to your country, if you really wanted to be here. We are being used and many Americans are being killed by these less than thirty year olds, this will make the gang problem worse. It is also not a racial issue, although some want it to be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Z

9:53 pm on Sunday, June 17, 2012

Do your friends know how you feel about immigration. I am sure the citizenship process back in the early 1700's was a little different. I don't think there is an easy fix for this issue, but I also don't think this is one of the biggest issues we are facing as a country. There are natural born citizens of this country that break the law every day, but because of their social, political and economic status they tend to get away with bail outs and dropped charges, yet we continue to disagree on people who want a better life through honest lifestyles. By the way the bible also says in Leviticus 19:34 "The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God."...and......Deuteronomy 10:18 "He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing." The law of man is not permanent Ms. Stevenson. Be a true friend to the Mexican family and tell them how you feel (if you haven't done so already).

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

11:25 pm on Sunday, June 17, 2012

Please enough twisting of the Bible quotes....

Where are all those screaming for separation of Church and State when you need them!!!

The verse you refer to means they are to be treated like natives, SUBJECT to the SAME laws and that is ALL that has been requested, the SAME standing under the laws NOT a preferred class. This isn't racist either, but basic common sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

10:28 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

There's no twisting going on here. The Bible is quite explicit in it's admonition that we should provide for the needs of foreigners just as we would widows and orphans. There are dozens of passages to support this. If you are an enemy of the immigrant then you are an enemy of god.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

10:55 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

There is NO directive at all to support ILLEGAL immigration – anywhere period.

There are however admonishments NOT apply laws differently, but treat people EQUALLY – which CAN’T happen if you create preferred classes.
In the logic you use Brian, the PRESIDENT has failed to follow the directive of scripture by using an arbitrary CUTOFF AGE - because you don’t see age used anywhere in all the sections you allude to.

Folks that have a problem with ILLEGAL immigration ACTUALLY defend LEGAL immigrants…

In summary, you just can’t defend WRONG.

Comment_arrow

North Georgia Weather

1:27 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

An enemy of God? So now you are my judge? Brian, we've said this over and over in different posts, quit misquoting the Bible to make an invalid point. The point is Mexico needs to take care of their citizens and let us take care of ours. We're under no obligation to bring everyone under our protective wings.

Brian, I can't afford to help everyone I'd like to help, I don't have the resources, just like our country doesn't have the resources to do it either.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

2:32 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Steve, in retrospect "enemy of God" was a little strong. My apologies.

Susan S

12:47 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

Mr Z, this is why we now have the new testament, we know longer live under the law in the old testament, but by grace in the new testament. If Obama really read his Bible he would know giving his blessing on same sex marriage was against what God teaches in the new testament.

Reply

Susan S

12:53 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

By the way my friends do know how I feel, and the only reason she has not gone back, is her visa expired and instead of the three years she was suppose to be here it has now been twelve, now she is stuck here. However her only reason for being here was to make enough money to move back to Mexico and buy a house. Just because I feel the law should be followed as to our constitution does not keep me from having friends of any culture.

Reply

Mr. Z

8:21 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

Just quoting the book that was used as a resource to help create this country. I didn't know the Old Testament was made invalid by the New one, thanks for that bit of knowledge. I guess can't teach old dogs new tricks.

Reply

Brian Crawford

10:51 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

First of all, the President hasn't granted immunity to anyone and the there is no executive order here. This is simply a matter of prioritizing resources when it comes to deportation based on American values of fairness and justice. Woodall is the one grandstanding and playing politics. The Dream Act had wide bi-partisan support before Obama was elected. Perhaps you should actually listen to what the President said:

"Now, let’s be clear. This is not amnesty. This is not immunity. This is not a path to citizenship. It’s not a permanent fix. This is a temporary, stopgap measure that lets us focus our resources wisely while giving a degree of relief and hope to talented, driven, patriotic young people. It is the — it is the right thing to do."

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/16/us/transcript-of-obamas-speech-on-immigration-policy.html?pagewanted=all

http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/20120612-napolitano-announces-deferred-action-process-for-young-people.shtm

Reply
Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

11:07 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

So you mean this directive is so beyond the pale that it can't even be documented by executive order? Will Janet tell us in the future that she simply "misunderstood" the President? Can’t have any evidence left behind can we?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

11:38 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brian, I (respectfully) disagree with you here. Immunity from deportation is immunity whichever way you cut it. I agree it is not a path to citizen, nor a permanent fix - but it is immunity. That being said, a permanent fix is definitely what is needed. However, to get that we need someone who can work across the aisle - that doesn't appear to be the case at the moment. In this case, I'm sure we will disagree on whose fault that is, but as the old adage goes, "it takes two to tango." Just saying "he" or "they" won't work with "us" or "me" isn't going to get it done, at least not the right way.

Comment_arrow

Rich Rewkowski

11:49 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

For three (3) days, I've been waiting with bated breath for Brian to set us all straight on what The President said and meant. So, Brian, if it's not amnesty, and it's not immunity, just what is it?
Now on the plus side, His speechwriters have departed from the usual condescending "let me make this perfectly clear", to "Now, let's be clear."

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

12:37 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Sharon, the record on this is pretty clear. There is no reaching across the aisle with the New Republicans. This President has made every attempt at reaching bi-partisan solutions, going as far as to adopt what had become the accepted Republican solution for health care reform...the individual mandate. The truth is Republicans have plotted from day one to do everything possible to defeat Obama's re-election including intentionally stalling our nation's economic recovery. Everyone of them deserves to be drummed out of office starting with Rob Woodall and Paul Broun.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

1:33 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Hi Rich, sorry I kept you waiting. I sometimes find it useful to be fashionably late. Both immunity and amnesty imply permanence. This is temporary relief that makes sense. Read the transcript.

Athens Mama

10:57 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

This is one of those issues that truly has me perplexed without a solid suggestion for a solution. I am a Christian. I am a liberal. I believe in sharing and affording others the same opportunities afforded our ancestors. Still, I am unable to get jobs in the local school district that require complete bilingual fluency - jobs that are funded by state and local taxpayer dollars. I borrowed money from the federal government to get a college education, and have great difficulty finding work. I have always worked to support my family and am almost finished with a graduate degree, but will face the tough economy when it is time to find work in my field next year. I cannot imagine how it must be for those who are less educated, have more children, and a more narrow skill set, facing this economy. I know that those who argue for deporting all illegals have valid points. Still, illegals support a lot of corporations who don't pay a dime in tax dollars. Illegals shop at Wal-mart, buy gas, and other goods and services and yet the corporations who reap the profits get by without tax liability like the rest of us. It seems that the finger should be looking at the big sharks instead of the minnows.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

11:30 am on Monday, June 18, 2012

Athens Mama, I agree with much of what you say here. I have known companies, some personally, who have had to close because by staying within the law and only employing legal workers, they cannot compete with those companies who don't. However, those who don't claim compassion for the people who "need a job and are here anyway." I feel that compassion too. It appears that those who should know what to do to fix the problem either don't know - or don't want to.

Reply

Susan S

12:30 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Again Brian we are to follow man's law and the constitution says the federal govt is suppose to uphold the laws of the land, instead they have done little to combat this issue. This is why the states took it on. The illegla immigration problems has cost the taxpayers entirely too much. While we struggle as a middle class, they send money home. They burden our hospitals, our police, and our schools. They indeed take away jobs for those who are here LEGALLY. I do not have an issue with anyone who comes here legally, however many people have been victims of crimes near the border from those crossing illegally. We are the land of the free, however with freedom comes responsibility. I for one would not get in a car and drive illegally, however they have no problem doing so. That is also breaking the law. So many things that follow the first steps across the border, have other illegal things to follow. Not paying income tax, is another. So right away they break three laws without thinking anything about it. Does this need to be fixed of course, but with the President constantly using his authority to bend the rules it just complicates the issues more. Congress should be making these decisions, and if not congress than a vote by the American people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

12:45 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Susan, that simply isn't true. No previous administration has done more to secure the border or deport illegals. That is a stone cold fact. The reason the states took this on was to fill prison beds for the Correctional Corporation of America. Turns out there's big money in human suffering. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuGE1VxVsYo

Comment_arrow

North Georgia Weather

1:06 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Yea Brian... that's it. It's big corporations and money that caused all of these illegals to be here.

Unbelievable.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

1:57 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Steve, who said big corporations and money caused all of these illegals to be here? But the fact is lobbyists from the private prison industry helped write Arizona's original anti-immigration law and were instrumental in proliferating copycat legislation all across America. They don't cause immigrants to be here but they do exploit anti-immigrant sentiment for profit.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

4:05 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Yes Brian you are correct.
The LOUSY economy of the OBAMA years has done more to help self DEPORT than any recent administration... But wait the private sector is doing JUST fine…

WOW Prison firms that help write legislation …
Almost as revolutionary as LaRaza championing open borders for the ILEGALS, er the undocumented …

Karsten Torch

12:48 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Here's my thing on this, and what it boils down to. Has to do with the word: "illegal." It's really not a tough concept. They're not undocumented, they're here illegally. Neither this president nor any one before him has the right to decide what laws to ignore or not to ignore. I find out immigration system to be a mess, and agree that it needs to be overhauled, but ignoring the parts that make us uncomfortable, or just deciding not to enforce the laws that we have is a ridiculous way to go about it.

Amnesty is not the answer either - why in the world would we want to reward people for breaking the law? And that's what it all boils down to - the people that are here illegally are criminals. If it were up to me, I would completely overhaul the system and make it so it would be easy to come here, just make sure you sign the log when you cross. And get out now, because if you're caught here being illegal, you will never get the chance to become an American, or even to get a work visa. You have 1 month to get out and come back in the right way, time starts now.

I agree we need to make this an easier process. God knows pretty much none of us would be here if the immigration laws were the same then as they are now. But do it the right way, send it through Congress and change laws the way they were meant to be changed. And let's not reward criminals. It just makes no sense.....

Reply

Susan S

1:04 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Well that is his take and Janet's, ask any border patrol person and the poor ranchers and property owners along the border and they will differ with the President. He along with the rest of his appointees are in the crapper with socialist and communist. Right after his election I started looking up for myself bio's on his appointees. Most are members or connected with the socialist party. They were listed in books and stories by the parties. This is a man who had NO experience and hardly worked a day in his life. He bragged about blowing coke and the alst two years of high school being high and a fog. If your boss knew this about you, would you get the job? Again NO work related experience and he is running the country? What has he done Brian? Because if you ask most people we are not better off than four years ago. Even the black race have been unfriended by him, they got nothing he promised them including jobs. He fails to uphold the constitution, yet promised to uphold it. Come on Brian tell us what he has done?

Reply

Susan S

1:05 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Last two years (correction)

Reply

North Georgia Weather

1:10 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Karsten... if the laws then were like they are now, the rest of the world would have joined us here a long time ago! :-)

It shouldn't be easy to become a citizen. You must have the desire and determination to share in our freedom in this country and the easier you make it, the less valuable it becomes.

Reply

Susan S

1:11 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Oh and as far as reaching across the aisle, the first year in office Mr.Transperncy met behind closed doors with the Dems. Many republicans called and sent letter after letter to a President who failed to answer them. Maybe you should check out their interviews that first year. I am sure MSNBC and CNN did not cover it. However many repubs are totally ignored by this President over and over. Kinda hard to agree or come to a conclusion when the head doesn't talk to the neck.

Reply

jm fay

1:19 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brian:

You seem to be forgetting reality. The Dream Act failed due to several D Senators refusing to go along with the rest of the party. One of them was Jon Tester of MT who knows better and he is from a red state and the lady Senator from LA who feared if she voted for it she wouldnt get re-elected.

Being anti illegal immigration draws all people from all parties as it effects most of us so please dont act like its all the Republicans stopping reform from happening.

This is also year 5 of a hard recession and jobs are not being created fast enough yet we have enough to give illegals and also legal immigrants before we take care of our own citizens and the legal immigrants we already allowed in? 2 million per year; 50 % of them have work visas coming in; the other 50 % are chain migration people and they mostly will want to work too. The American people are not stupid and both parties are to blame for nothing getting done.

As for making money off of private prisons due to them; we are all for shipping them home to spend their prision time there providing we are assured from their own country they will spend all the time given to them in prision. (That way too the American people arent paying the bills for them)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

1:57 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

The Dream Act was passed in the House and there were plenty of votes for passage in the Senate. Unfortunately Dems could not bypass the Republican filibuster. Unlike Pubs, Democrats don't always vote in lock step with the party's talking points. I actually view that as a strength.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

12:00 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

And Republicans like Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins NEVER break ranks...

jm fay

1:35 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brian: There was a story on NPR about the parishes in LA taking advantage of the numbers of illegals who are jailed there; to fill up their own jails; pay for the costs to run their own jails; upgrade their equipment, unifomrs, etc so its not just private prisons profiting from illegals.

Frankly though they committed their crimes here; it would be nice to have a way to ship them back and make their own countries pay to feed and house them while they serve their time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

2:30 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

You'll have to give us a link to the NPR story....doesn't make much sense to me. It COSTS publicly owned jails to house prisoners, how are they profiting?

jm fay

1:52 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

This country gives citizenship papers like its candy to just about anyone.

1. Born here as long as parents are not diplomats. (they could be here on a temporary visa including a tourist, student, etc.)

2. 5 years of working here on a work permit visas.

and if you are a relative of a ciitzen; you get in through chain migration eventually. If you are a spouse; you could be working straightaway though you are not given a green card straightaway; you just work illegally until you get it.

No other country is as generous and you wonder why the citizens are mad about this? There are at least 2 terrorists that were born here due to this though they are not living here now; they hold US citizenship. Its very hard to lose it too; you have to renounce it and pay a fee.

Reply

Wilson

2:07 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

I bet many of you do not know that the members of the Republican party set out to ruin Pres. Obama on the night of his inauguration. The party of NO were privately meeting and were determined to kill any measures that were put forth before Congress with a no vote. This lead to executive orders, recess appointments and the like.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karsten Torch

3:03 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Of course they were. It's all just an anti-Obama conspiracy. Damn Republicans....

Oh, and GW was flying one of the planes, too.....

Brian Crawford

2:44 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Here's a good read from NPR on how the private prison industry is driving anti-immigrant legislation:

http://www.npr.org/2010/10/28/130833741/prison-economics-help-drive-ariz-immigration-law

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karsten Torch

3:08 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

So we're going to blame anti-illegal legislation on profiteering? They make something illegal illegal, and it has nothing to do with our federal government not upholding our current laws? And we're supposed to believe this? I'm not saying it doesn't have something to do with it, but very minor. At most. Truth is, the laws haven't been being upheld in a long time - not just the current administration, but long before. People are tired of it. And then Janet decides to issue the decree that no illegals will be picked up from the Arizona justice system - again, just another example of skirting the laws. Hell, not even skirting, how about downright blatantly ignoring the laws?

What we're talking about here is Obama just deciding which laws to enforce and not to enforce - which isn't his purview. At all. If he doesn't like them, change them. But, again, don't expect us to reward criminals and be happy about it.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

3:29 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

The private prison industry's role in this is far from minor, they helped write the legislation for cripes sake. The facts in the NPR article are well documented. An interesting aside; Russell Pearce, the powerful Arizona state legislator who pushed SB1070 through the AZ statehouse, was recalled by AZ voters last year primarily over his anti-immigration policies.

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

3:17 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Immigrating to the U.S. is not easy - I can certainly attest to that. However, it is what it is - like becoming a surgeon. If it was easy, we'd all do it. That being said, it has many flaws and needs to be corrected. But the U.S. is not the only country with immigration laws. Many years ago when I still lived in South AFrica, I had a friend who had to return to the UK from SA because of immigration laws. Her husband was an auto mechanic and when the economy tanked, putting a whole lot of auto workers back out on the streets, they had to leave because their visa had been based on his employment with the auto industry. We were upset, had become friends over the 3 years they had lived in SA, but they were told there are fewer jobs and it is the birthright of citizens of SA to have the ones that were available. They returned and were able to make it permanent a few years later when the economy picked up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

3:42 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Except for the most part, illegal immigrants are doing the work that Americans don't want to do. Even with state unemployment over 10% Georgia farmers suffered millions of dollars of crop loss last year because they couldn't find enough legal workers to harvest their produce.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

4:00 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brian, that's not necessarily true. As I said before, I do know people who have had to close down businesses because they have tried to operate within the law. The law sets minimum wage rates, and legislates deductions etc. that make it difficult to comply. Illegal workers allow for those jobs to be done by people prepared to circumvent that system. It puts those operating within the law out of business. That is not OK and is definitely not people doing jobs that nobody else will do. I'll give you, that is the case in some instances - but definitely not the majority of instances - especially not today in this economy.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

4:13 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brian
The farmers who claimed to LOSE crops were operating ILEGALLY themselves by NOT using the FEDERAL H2A program.

The H2A provides access to an UNLIMITED number of foreign seasonal workers and there are farmers that do COMPLY with the laws.

Why should we support those farms that CHOOSE to break the laws themselves?

As to the OLD argument that "they do jobs others won’t", that’s almost as old as the world being flat…

it’s an urban legend now a days

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

5:08 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Sharon, I'm not talking about those who circumvent the law by paying less than the minimum wage. Farmers can't find enough workers even when they pay the legal wage. It's the same for most menial labor jobs.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

5:17 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

@Brian YOU Blew right past H2A WHY?

It provides a LEGAL path to ALL the labor you need - if you can't get it local..

Could it be you can't speak to farm operations?

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

7:27 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

@Brian Are you serious? The reason you say H2A doesn't work is because the GOVERNMENT can't operate it!!

YOU believe a government program affecting 800,000 plus is the way to go when the government can't process paperwork for 60 people...

H2A has been around since the 1980s but he JUST started ...

“This year, Stanley and other onion farmers BEGAN using a federal guest worker program called H2A. It basically imports workers from countries like Mexico, and then sends them back when the work is finished.

"I had ordered 60 people (via H2A) with the paperwork and everything," Stanley said. But he said the government botched that request.
"And now I've only got 17 people when I'm supposed to have 60. The excuse they gave me was, they lost my paperwork," Stanley said. "

Hey... let’s STOP NOT enforcing laws and START fixing what we have already FIRST…

North Georgia Weather

3:46 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brian, that doesn't mean we want illegal people in this country!!! How hard is that to understand??? THEY ARE ILLEGAL. We lock up illegal people. We have a justice system to deal with illegal people.

Why do you insist that coming here illegally is OK with us because it's not?

Reply

Tammy Osier

3:47 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

@ JM Fay- re: your response to me. We agree more than you think. Immigration reform would START with sealing of the borders. As far as Romney being better or not- Romney showed in his state that he was willingto do the will of his people. He is under a lot of pressure to prove justthat if he becomes the next president. I promise you, the republicans will hold him accountable. That's what the TEA party was about. Regardless of what people thought it was about, the first thing they did was fire REPUBLICANS not doing their jobs. So, he is definately the better of the two. Otherwise, we have a sure thing of going down an unrecoverable socilist landslide. Sure, we have the 3 divisions of power, but Pelosi and Reid showed that they could do whatever they wanted unncontested by their own, so it is possible.

Reply

Tammy Osier

3:58 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Also, I never understood the premise that illegals do the work Americans don't want to do. I think that's a democrat talking point if I ever heard one. My son had a hard time getting a job in construction because of the people who would work cheaper. On that note - we have laws that keep us from working children (aka slave labor), and a minimum wage, yet we seem to think it's ok to hire people that'll work for $4 an hour. Talk about USING people!
Call me strange, but I don't think it right that a person can steal a social security number and no one has a problem with it. What about crime? Someone kills your loved one and hey! We can't find them or trace them because they aren't on our roll books. I could go on and on. I love the idea of what our country was founded on, we're a beautiful melting pot! So, all the more reason not to put people in the position of having to hide and work for low wages. let's respect freedom loving people and fix our system so that they can come in and enjoy the true fruits of their labor. The bible tells us in the epistles to obey the laws of our land (and in that obeying God), so given the premise of our founding, we should receive people with open arms, but start by teaching them to respect the law so that they themselves can become law abiding productive citizens.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

4:43 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

And to Tammy's point - that's what our LEGAL Immigration system does ... besides screening out diseases like TB, etc.

Do YOU want your school aged child exposed in school with no recourse?

It’s happened to hundreds (if not thousands) of GA school children and staff already.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

5:00 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

I actually agree with most of what you said. So doesn't it follow that we should find a way to welcome those who were brought here as children and raised to be freedom loving Americans who have proven that they want to be contributing, documented members of our society? The Dream Act is the right thing to do and so are the actions President Obama took last Friday.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

5:47 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Because the method used by the Mr Obama skirts law ENFORCEMENT.

He just told a massive group they are immune to prosecution.
The common use of items or programs like this in other areas of government such as traffic tickets, taxes overdue or jury duty (like recently occurred in Fulton county) are usually referred to as AMNESTY, if there is NO penalty attached during the terms of the program. This one has no penalty.

Mr. Obama did this WITHOUT clamping down RIGHT NOW on the ability for EVEN more to enter at our borders and claim the prize…

I still don’t understand about this “work permit” thing. You mean you SUPPORT carrying PAPERS to prove a worker’s eligibility? I thought that was the major claim against many state bills that simply wanted immigrants to carry the papers ALREADY required by existing FEDERAL law because THAT was un-American?

So will the permit requirement actually disappear after a “future” un-American uproar?

So now regardless of what decision the Supreme Court actually makes, will this decree of policy, (that’s unwritten at this point) now mean that the States laws are no longer in agreement with the Federal Law as they were originally so painstakingly designed to be?

All this without passage of any laws - even the Healthcare bill wasn’t done this way.

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

5:17 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Brain, I think our conversation here shows that we're almost at a consensus as to what should be done, just not how it was done. One man (or woman's) choice is not the way to go. This one might work for you, but what if it was something you and the majority of the country was against. We don't know who might hold the office in the future and what they might think it is OK to impose. The system was set up to prevent that. Do it, but do it the right way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

10:49 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

What exactly is being imposed here? This is simply a case of prosecutorial discretion combined with the creative use of existing work permit programs to offer hope to thousands of aspiring young people who are every bit American as you and I yet have no legal claim to citizenship.

Personally I think what Obama has done is brilliant because it is forcing us to address an issue of fundamental unfairness that has been swept under the rug by years of poison politics.

This is also a good opportunity to talk about the Republican abuse of the filibuster, which in itself is unconstitutional, because without it the Dream Act would have become law long ago. If you want to talk about imposing one's political will I suggest we start there.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

12:25 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

"creative" use of existing work permit programs BYPASSING current FEDERAL and State LAWS would seem to be a clue here.

I believe the 60 vote was established by Democrats back in the day…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloture

In 1975, the Democratic Senate majority, having achieved a net gain of four seats in the 1974 Senate elections to a strength of 61 (with an additional Independent caucusing with them for a total of 62), reduced the necessary supermajority to three-fifths (60 out of 100).[11] However, as a compromise to those who were against the revision, the new rule also changed the requirement for determining the number of votes needed for a cloture motion's passage from those Senators "present and voting" to those Senators "duly chosen and sworn". Thus, 60 votes for cloture would be necessary regardless of whether every Senator voted. The only time a lesser number would become acceptable is when a Senate seat is vacant. (For example, if there were two vacancies in the Senate, thereby making 98 Senators "duly chosen and sworn", it would only take 59 votes for a cloture motion to pass.)[9]

The new version of the cloture rule, which has remained in place since 1975, makes it considerably easier for the Senate MAJORITY to invoke cloture.
Harry Reid is STILL a DEM correct?

So why not fix it FIRST - this isn’t a REPUBILCAN problem

North Georgia Weather

5:33 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

What happens when the 800,000 people who are now going to stay (and all within the childbearing years) have 3 kids each? Are we going to foot that bill like we do now? And then we'll say "oh, let's grant them amnesty now since their kids were born here."

It never ends.

Reply

Leave a comment