patching...
Update: Get Barrow Patch news in your inbox each day by subscribing to our free newsletter »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Does Metro Atlanta Need a Second Airport?

For Metro Atlanta, Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport is it. Would you like to see it get a back-up airport, and if so, where should it be located?

 

Most major international airports in the US have a second, or even third, airport to back them up. In New York, JF Kennedy International Airport is backed up by LaGuardia and Newark Liberty International, in Chicago, there is O’Hare and Midway and in the Atlanta area there is Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport and… Well, there is Hartfield-Jackson International Airport.

Despite being the busiest airport in not just the US but also the world, metro Atlanta has no back-up airport. According to Wikipedia, Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport not only has the largest number of passengers passing through it, but it also moves the most aircrafts in the world annually.

There has been a lot of talk recently, sometimes pretty heated talk, about possibly converting Briscoe Field in Gwinnett County to becoming that back-up airport for Hartsfield-Jackson. Those who live in the area around Briscoe Field, and are likely to be most impacted, have actively campaigned against it. Those who are likely to benefit the most should it expand to take the overflow from Hartsfield-Jackson have said they would like to see Gwinnett get the business.

So the question today is twofold. Firstly, does metro Atlanta need a second airport? And secondly, if so, where would you like to see it located?

Related Topics: briscoe field

Tim Sullivan

9:57 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I think it is needed, the where & how big are the questions. What ever happened to the property in Dawsonville that the city of Atlanta owns? It was proposed as a second airport, I think the state is now looking at using it for a resivoure [sp?]?

Reply

Dan Matthews

10:24 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

The other airport in New York is spelled LaGuardia

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

11:18 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Thanks for the correction Dan.

Patch_comments_icon

Vanzetta Evans

10:46 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I really think Atlanta needs a second airport. It might bring down airfares around here. I've always lived where there were other airport options. When I was in Boston, you could fly into Providence, RI or Manchester, NH. In Upstate NY, there was another airport about an hour, hour and a half away. You could price shop. But where would it go here in Metro Atlanta? There's strong opposition to Briscoe expanding and I don't see any other community welcoming a major airport with open arms.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dacula_dude

11:42 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Actually Vanzetta less competition at a smaller secondary airport can actually drive prices up. My brother used to live in mid NY state very close to Stewart airport which was an Air Force base converted to a small airport. Because it was small, only Delta and one or two others flew in there. As a result it was TWICE as much to fly there as Newark or Laguardia. So I never could fly in there when I visited and my brother's company would not pay for him to fly out of there, they instead paid for a car service to take him down to Laguardia.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Vanzetta Evans

5:25 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Well Dacula_Dude, in all of my travel experiences flying in and out of Upstate NY, I've found prices to be cheaper. Stewart is a very small airport, but flights out of Rochester and Buffalo are cheaper and they are only about an hour apart. I've never understood why my family in Rochester can get flights to Florida for much cheaper than I can to Florida. And they'll often have to change planes in Atlanta!

Jim Regan

11:15 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

The reality is the airline industry is consolidating to larger hubs, regional airports are losing carriers. Aviation analysts forecast 100-125 regional airports will lose carriers in the next 5-8 years nationwide. We're down from 7 major airlines to 4, almost all the regional carriers are gone. But some people think its a great time to start a new airport?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

11:21 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I'm selfish enough to want another one closer to where I live, but I do have sympathy for homeowners who moved into an area without an airport only to find one might come along. However, if not Briscoe, now might be a good time to find land that isn't too close to a populated area and at least earmark it for the project. That way anyone looking to relocate would know in advance they might one day be under an airport.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

12:05 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Sharon you are correct - elsewhere and upfront is good

Besides the effort in Gwinnet could never be a back-up to Hartsfield anyway - its being pitched as a "tiny" regional that on that face makes little sense with everything that has been released to date.

Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

1:52 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

That happened 30 years ago when City of Atlanta bought 15,000 acres near Dawsonville and 12,000 acres near Powder Springs. The simple fact is there isn't enough demand to support a second airport, or it would have been built already.

And as you said people are putting their selfishness, and greed, above that of people who did not want to be near a regional airport. No one moved to Gwinnett because we are close to Hartfield. I personally value the quality of everyday life over the convenience of an occasional trip.

You can't make this radical change to such a large portion of the county without sever repercussions

Keith Sutherland

11:22 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I don't think It is needed, especially aroung such a high residential area as Gwinnett County. If this is something that needs to be done then they should put it south of the Atlanta Airport in a more rural area.

Reply

Ken Clark

11:31 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

If your definition of major international airports is associated with Metropolitan Statistical Areas (i.e. big cities) then there are bunch of big cities that only have a single international airport; Los Angeles, Dallas, Houston, Philadelphia, Boston (Manchester & Providence are 50+ miles/1+ hours from Boston) - including ATL that's 6 out of the top 10 MSAs. Detroit, Phoenix, Minneapolis/St. Paul, San Diego, St. Louis, Denver, Pittsburgh, and Portland, OR are all top 25 MSAs without a 2nd int'l airport. Propeller wants you to believe Atlanta is the only major city without a 2nd airport - but it's just not true. But I'll play along.

No, ATL doesn't need a 2nd airport anytime soon. Its 2011 operations/flights were less than 2004. Check it out in the FAA ATADS website.

But if you need a 2nd airport in Atlanta, it'd have to be at a greenfield site like Dawsonville or Paulding County where ATL already owns land.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott

3:35 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Only a point to this.

There are at least 2 International airports in LA (LAX and ONT). SNA (John Wayne) used to handle some inbound international flights, but that might have ended recently. In all there are FIVE (5) airports that service LA (LAX, ONT, SNA, Bob Hope, Long Beach). Add 2 more if you include LA/Palmdale and Palm Springs (about an hour east of the Ontario Airport). [Many in the LA area might consider Palm Springs "local"]

Also, Dallas has Love Field handling domestic flights. Houston has 3 (William P. Hobby Airport, Ellington Airport, and George Bush Intercontinental Airport)

Look overseas at how they handle airports. Most of Asia has domestic airports and international airports to handle the traffic "better". How does ATL do it? Build a $1.4 Billion "terminal" with 12 gates (only 12 gates?) to handle international travel. (sure, some say it will combine with "E" to give us 40 international gates, but what's the point?

In less than 20 years we've moved the international gates from Concourse T to E to F. Let's move it to an entirely different airport! (Concourse E opened in 1994 as "state of the art" before the '96 Olympics, now we have "Concourse F" with 12 gates that has marked the city with shady deals worse than the Gwinnett council of the recent past.)

Comment_arrow

Ken Clark

4:11 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Scott,

I took the opening statement in the article to mean backup of international service capability - and within a specific MSA. ONT and SNA aren't in the Los Angeles MSA (gotta bound things some how - I chose MSA, others may chose commuting distance or time). Bob Hope and Long Beach don't have international service. Similarly, Love field and Hobby don't have international service. For that matter, LGA doesn't have non-stop international service beyond 1500 miles - i.e. you can fly to Canada. Similarly, MDW doesn't provide hardly any international service that would really "back up" ORD. Are the LA and Chicago airports complementary in their role? Yes. Perhaps the author would clarify what they meant?

Regardless, there are still "really big cities" with only one airport with combined commercial domestic/international service - e.g. Philadelphia (which is bigger than Atlanta in terms of population), Boston, Detroit, Phoenix, Minneapolis/St. Paul, San Diego, St. Louis, Denver, Pittsburgh, Portland, etc. So, HJAIA is not alone that way.

The bigger point is you can't change a General Aviation airport (like Briscoe) to a commercial airport after it's served 50 years as a General Aviation airport. The City of Atlanta has the properties in Dawson & Paulding counties. That's where you expand - but only when you need to.

Jim Regan

1:28 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Another thing to consider many northeastern cities with multiple airports have a larger population base than Atlanta. And most of there passengers are arriving and departing rather than just connecting to another flight. 70 percent of Hartsfield passenger are connecting, Briscoe would never take this business from Hartsfield.

Most cities with two airports have this situation because the original airport began in the 1920s. When the city out grew the original airport, a second airport was built.
When Atlanta out grew the original airport in the 1950s, it was closed, and Hartsfield was built. Because additional property has been acquired it has prevented Hartsfield from becoming obsolete.

Compare Hartfield to JFK or many other airports that are an odd jumble of terminals. Hartsfield was is very organized and well laid out.

Reply

Scott

3:44 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

ATL doesn't "NEED" a 2nd airport, but it would be nice. Although, at this point everybody will say "not in my backyard" and that's what Gwinnett is doing. Not only do we not want it in our backyard, but I would expect that the main Atlanta airport doesn't want Gwinnett to expand because it would really screw up the flight pattern into the ATL air space. How many have sat out at night and watched the planes line up heading down 316 and 85 as they head south to land?

In the past there has been discussion about Chattanooga being the 2nd airport, but really that's 1.5 hours away and often socked in with fog at random times so that wouldn't work.

Macon? Well, sure, but that's on the south side and the population concentration for Atlanta is mostly north so not many would drive through town to go toward Macon.

From the north side of Gwinnett how many have just gone up to Greenville to fly out of there? That's NICE! You should try it sometime.

Yes, it would be nice to have another airport, but at what cost? And what is the real reason for it? ATL can still expand. There is talk of adding a 6th runway. (http://tinyurl.com/ATL-6th). So, why is there such a push for a 2nd airport? GREED! Local Governments want the revenue that comes with the possibility of growth around having that airport in their backyard. With little respect for what the people desire the real focus to be on.

Not in my backyard...without there being a really good reason.

Reply

Robert Johnson

8:11 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Lets be factual ladies and gentlemen:

New York has 5 airports which include - JFK, La Guardia, Newark, White Plains, Islip

LA has 5 airports - LAX, Newport, Long Beach, Burbank, Ontario

Chicago has 2 - O'Hare & Midway

Dallas has 2 - Love Field and DFW

Philadelphia has 2 or 3 depending on how you count it - Philly, Atlantic City, Newark

Houston has 2 - Hobby and George Bush

Washington has 3 - Reagan National, Dulles and Baltimore Intl'

Miami has 3 - Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Palm Beach

Atlanta has 1 - Hartsfield

Boston has 3 - Logan, Manchester - Boston and Providence.

The above are the top 10 metro areas in order of size in the U.S. Just saying.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

8:56 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Well if were going to compare geographic area based on population maybe we should include Greenville, Chattanooga, Athens, Macon, and Columbus which are all within 90 minutes drive of Atlanta and Birmingham which is two hours. Using this definition we already have 7 airports within our service area. With all this competition in the area why in the world would anyone suggest building an 8th airport?

Comment_arrow

Robert Johnson

9:19 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

What a ridiculous statement to make, why don't you add New Orleans to the list. Metro Atlanta does not make up Birmingham or Macon or Athens or Columbus etc... I mean come on don't be silly. Plus you cant get on commercial flights from Athens or Macon.... I am not advocating in either direction, just stating fact which is clearly being twisted by everyone.

Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

9:34 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

If that is not Hartsfield's geograhic area then why does Groome Transportation have 38 shuttle trips from Nashville - Chattanooga - Hartsfield every day? They do the same thing Columbus-Hartsfield, but I don't know the numbers of daily trips. Until recently they also operate shuttle service to Savannah. And doesn't Clark Howard refer to Birmingham as Atlanta's other airport?

Comment_arrow

Ken Clark

10:39 am on Friday, May 25, 2012

RJ,

If you're going to consider Newark as a Philadelphia airport (EWR is a 90 mile drive from PHL), then why not include Stewart Int'l as a NYC airport? Especially since Stewart was the worst failure of the FAA privatization program - NY taxpayers got stuck with a $78.5M tab when the European operator backed out. Anyway, with your 90 mile rule you could add Milwaukee to ORD, etc., etc. BTW, some of the airports you listed above - you can't get there from here. You can't fly non-stop to Long Beach, Burbank, Islip, or Love Field from HJAIA - i.e. those aiports don't back up LAX. BTW Part II, Macon Regional Airport flies Airbus A-319s and 320s, Canadair CRJ-700s, and Boeing 737-400s to places like Phoenix, Charlotte, and Toronto. Not very often, but they do - you can definitely get commercial flights there. So, yes, let's be factual. The title of this article included "Metro Atlanta". That's why I stuck with the Metropolitan Statistical Area - which the U.S. OMB defines, not me.

All that said, I don't see that you answered the two questions in this thread. What's your take?

Jeremiah McCurry

8:28 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

NIMBY

Barrow and Gwinnett residents both say no. Sometimes you just have to anger a portion of the population to get things done.

Reply

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

11:09 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

@Jeremiah Please let us know what primary / office you have qualified for... OK?

Reply

Tommy Tune

9:26 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Mr Regan, come now. Let's stop with the rhetoric and simply step aside and let the citizens of Gwinnett (the 800,000+ residents) vote on this issue in July. In other words, put the issue to a vote rather than have 500 or so NIMBY citizens decide the fate of the County or the 5 BOC members. If it passes, there's an airport. If it doesn't pass, then there is no airport. Is this too difficult of a concept for you to understand?

Reply
Comment_arrow

dacula_dude

1:11 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Tommy I suggest that we put a referendum on the ballot to put a landfill next to your house. Lets step aside and let the citizens decide.

Seriously though, you are suggesting we circumvent some of the very ideas this country was founded on. Representative government protects the minority from the whims of the majority.

Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

8:25 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Tommy, This isn't the usual NIMBY situation. Regardless of which side people are on...one thing that can be agreed upon once the airport is expanded or not expanded..things go from there...not a way to really put the crap back in the horse so t speak.

Because of that I don't mind the strong feelings of those against expansion. I wouldn't expect anything less.

S. Hawk

12:18 pm on Saturday, May 26, 2012

Why is Briscoe the only consideration? What about these other municipal airports?
1. Covington Municipal Airport
2. DeKalb-Peachtree Airport
3. Fulton County Airport / Charlie Brown Field
4. Cobb County Airport / McCollum Field Kennesaw
5. Cartersville Airport Cartersville
6. Newnan-Coweta County Airport Newnan
7. Cherokee County Airport Canton / Ball Ground
8. Paulding County Regional Airport Dallas
9. Clayton County Airport / Tara Field Hampton
(former Henry County Airport / Morris Field)
10. Falcon Field Peachtree City

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ken Clark

1:51 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

FWIW, the AMACS 2 study did consider your list - as follows...

1. Covington Municipal Airport - removed due to site issues
2. DeKalb-Peachtree Airport - removed due to airspace issues
3. Fulton County Airport / Charlie Brown Field - removed due to airspace issues
4. Cobb County Airport / McCollum Field Kennesaw - to be reviewed
5. Cartersville Airport Cartersville - to be reviewed
6. Newnan-Coweta County Airport Newnan - removed due to proximity to Atl & market strength
7. Cherokee County Airport Canton / Ball Ground - to be reviewed
8. Paulding County Regional Airport Dallas - to be reviewed
9. Clayton County Airport / Tara Field Hampton - removed due to proximity to Atl & market strength
(former Henry County Airport / Morris Field)
10. Falcon Field Peachtree City - removed due to site issues

Here's the link...

http://www.atlanta-airport.com/docs/Airport/AMACSExecutiveSummary.pdf

The airports that are designated as "to be reviewed" get some consideration in the AMACS report.

Hope this helps.

Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

8:28 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Thanks Ken...I had been meaning to ask if other airports had be considered. I had been looking at some of them on my own. I'm curious to read about McCollum, Cartersville and Cherokee. Thanks for the link!

M.K. Osborne

2:00 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Ken , why did Athens quit Commercial flights ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ken Clark

5:45 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Couldn't really say why, but according to Wikipedia Air Midwest/US Airways Express pulled out in 2008 leaving them with - not much.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athens-Ben_Epps_Airport

flightaware.com shows no airline flights at AHN.

Based on a quick check with FAA ATADS, Athens (AHN) had 35,696 operations in CY 2011. By contrast, LZU had 80,902 operations in CY 2011.

Maybe someone else knows the answer to "why"?

M.K. Osborne

2:06 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

If we do need one it should locate in middle/central georgia with rail linking to metro Area. Plenty of land out there and they need the economic boost . kinda like the Jacksonville airport.

Reply

Floyd Akridge

8:31 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Kevin...I've thought about that too...especially with the rail link. My first and only real question though is the economics of it...if the airport could sustain itself...it would be that much farther from the north metro area...having to go basically right by Hartsfield...It would be an interesting study for sure.

Reply

M.K. Osborne

8:47 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

wouldnt work without the rail , Im not sure of the numbers that come from there to Atlanta for the airport.

Reply

S. Hawk

7:00 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

@Ken Clark -- thank you for the update and the link concerning the other municipal airports.

Reply

needan

12:31 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

ATL airport top officials do not want the 2nd airport in the North or North-East or East of Atlanta. Why? It is pure GREED (money is the root of all evils) to have monopoly and wants to dominate on one airport for the whole Atlanta area ignoring the convenience, unwanted stress, traffic, air pollution, accidents, revenue to other county, etc., and even causing deaths to these travelers stuck in bumper to bumper traffic. Do metro atlantans from the North, North East and East have to suffer and risk their lives to commute all the way in this violent traffic in a poorly designed road network system of hwys and byways to catch the plane every time? City of Atlanta will dance accordingly silently with 1st airport which will not support the 2nd commercial airport in Gwinnett. Gwinnett Briscoe Airport was an ideal location. Besides politicians & city of Atlanta lobbing against it, DELTA is totally against the expansion of 2nd airport. Practically thinking - Is it the convenience of the people to catch the flight easily with less commute in this long traffic or should be the Atlantans punished every time as victims for this GREED for money attitude from the ATL airport officials and its supporters ? City of Atlanta and surrounding parties will be just silent and support the existing airport only arguing or suggesting why not put 10 runways and expand the ATL airport?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

12:49 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I appreciate that you hate the drive to Hartsfield, but if your personal convenience is such an overwhelming justification to build a 2nd airport at Briscoe, why don't you just move to College Park or Hapesville?

needan

12:34 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Don't you feel ashamed of boasting that ATL airport is the busiest in the world? It is not true. That title has to go to CHICAGO airport because they have 2 airports and then look at the traffic count in ORD.

Reply

needan

12:35 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

On the other hand a good % of blame goes to Gwinnettans too who do not want the airport blaming on quality of life and noise pollution. This will certainly help and stands in the favor of the FIRST airport top officials as well as the city of Atlanta which makes their job easier against the 2nd airport. Gwinnettans do not know how much decibel sound has increased at present due to the day by day increasing traffic noise from engines & road (especially from highways), video games, TV’s turned on, phone talk, various entertainment sounds, etc. is hitting their eardrums every second of their life. But when the jet is airborne that is a noise pollution. Actually, the new jets are way less noise than the older jets. Just go to an airport watch and listen to the Airbus A380 (which can accommodate 555 passengers) takes offs and landings. It will be hard to believe your ears and eyes. It is less noise compared to the existing pipers and the Cessna’s operating from the Briscoe airport. In Briscoe airport, it is not the A380s or B777's jets but ONLY approved for the small -medium jets B737 or A320s.

Reply

needan

12:36 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

It is people's ego, ignorance and rebellious attitude towards modernization backed by out dated thinking of some officials in Gwinnett county that knocked out a fantastic opportunity to have a 2nd airport very soon in all aspects who had sent a letter to Federal Aviation that Gwinnett county people does not want an airport no matter even it takes 2 hours or more sitting in the rush hour polluting the air which the Gwinnettans have no problem or stupid enough to accept and breath that highly polluted air and risk their own lives forever? Why not as an alternative, go further 5-10 miles down on Hwy 316 East where there are acres of nice flat farming lands to construct a 2nd airport? This will avoid people who are whining about a jet in their backyards. That is a very good possibility but who will come forward to make it happen?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

12:57 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I asked Brett Smith, Propeller CEO, that very same question. Why not do a green field airport on an appropriately sized parcel of land that would not negatively impact the current residents?

Brett's response. He wouldn't make any money, a green field airport would take to long to receive FAA and EPA approval. Brett's plan relied on getting Briscoe basically for free, as confirmed in Propeller's June 2012 proposal.

needan

2:10 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Jim, I agree with you totally in this point of view. Nothing wrong to have a green field airport if gwinnett airport does not work. What I understand is Propeller wants a quick rich approach eyeing only on "Profit Dollars". That is not a healthy approach. My strong gut feel is the green field airport if built in just 5-10 miles from Briscoe it will be very practical to meet the urgent needs of travelers from North & Eastern Suburbs + that airport will make huge profit which will provide ample employment, small business growth, lot of revenue for the county and of course taxes for IRS and GA State. After all, it will gain lot of attention from gwinnettans who had opposed this airport in the first place, later on saying it worked out well and they will support this new airport and think positively !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

2:42 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

An airport 5-10 miles east of Briscoe would be the wrong direction, plus there is already an airport in the area you describe Northeast Georgia Regional Airport - aka Winder-Barrow. The right location would be 15 miles west of Briscoe which would be the Cumming/Dawsonville area. Why you ask?
Think about the area required to make an airport successful, Gwinnett alone could not support a regional airport. 75% of Hartsfield passengers don't leave the terminal. The remaining 25% of Hartsfield's customers come from Douglasville, Kennesaw, Macon, Marietta, Atlanta, Cumming, Alpharetta, Athens, Greenville-SC and other towns. If you live in one of these areas you're going to fly from the most convenient airport, which offers the most flights to your destination, and at the lowest price. How many people do you think are going to drive from Macon or Kennesaw to Briscoe for a flight? I would suggest the most probable answer would be zero. But if Atlanta's 2nd airport were centrally located would it get much more use? And isn't it interesting that the City of Atlanta bought 15,000 acres in Dawsonville in the 1970s for a second airport?

Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

2:48 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

The second consideration is who is going to spend the next 3-4 years getting approval from the FAA & EPA and spend the $400-500 M to build the airport? Personally, I do not want Gwinnett government to take that kind of risk with my tax money. There are too many examples of goverments taking that risk only to fail. Look no further than MidAmerica airport near St Louis for an example from the 1990s.

needan

2:48 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

REPLY- why don't you just move to College Park or Hapesville?"

Appreciate your response Jim, If you suggested a choice, how about me give you some more choices? Also, some points to think!
1) Why don't you move to a place where jet sound can't be heard so you can live peacefully?
2) We were all born as babies and if no growth what it would be like? Growth is a natural thing we all have to accept. We grow size wise and older.
3) Does it make any logic that a major city like Atlanta should have only ONE airport and should be in the South side of the city? Also, not to have any other commercial airports in future on other side of the city (here it is North)?
4) Do all air travelers have to stay in Clayton & Henry counties?
5) As a city grows leaps and bounds so does the need for another airport arises? No logic or excuse for anyone to say that I bought my house 10 years or 20 years back thinking that another airport will not come or the existing private airport not be upgraded to commercial airport?
6) City's growth becomes more important when compared to people's personal likes, preference, demands and wants. Those who are against another airport are basically stopping or hindering the growth of that city.

Think logically!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

3:28 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Hey you were complaining about the drive to Hartsfield. I too hated the drive for the 10 years I traveled 50%, but I made the decision to live in Gwinnett and knew ATL was 50 miles.

Most cities have 2 airports because they outgrew the one original developed in the 1920-1930s as aviation changed. ATL also outgrew the original airport, so Hartsfield was built, the old one closed. ATL followed a master plan to create an efficient well layed out operation. Today it is not over capacity, but will need expansion in 7-10 years. Multiple airports in a region does not create more competition, but may increase flight operation expense and hence ticket prices.

Gwinnett missed the boat by failing to anticipate the possible expansion of Briscoe and properly zoning the land around the airport. The second missed opportunity occurred in the 1990's when they chose not move the airport away from L'ville when the expansion was done.

Honestly Briscoe has more value to the community as a way to attract corporate aviation. CEOs want to be near the corporate jet and often locate HQ near the airport. Not to many corp jets based at Hartsfield these days. If we envision 316 being a research/medical/technology corridor a scheduled passenger aviation airport would not add value. Much better for Gwinnett to put its efforts into developing the area colleges and improving the graduation rate of public schools.

needan

2:59 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I have no problem with Dawsonville to have the 2nd airport. But from Briscoe it is another 25 miles approx right? Distance wise, it is getting more far for people from Norcross, Alpharetta, Snellville, Grayson, Loganville, Dacula, Buford, Suwanee, Lawrenceville, Winder, Athens, Cumming and areas next to I-575 and I-75 corridor. Personally, I don't mind traveling to Dawsonville to catch the flight in shortest time with less hazzle. If the city of Atlanta bought that land it should have been developed 10 years back and it is not too late ! We need another airport !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

3:40 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

You can just say we need another airport, it has to be a business decision.

The question must be is another airport required due to safety or capacity reasons?

If another airport were to be build would it be successful? I don't blame ATL for not taking the risk to fund a second airport, it is a huge expense.

No it's not to late for the Dawsonville site to be developed, but look at the aviation industry. Is it stable? Not really I read today that American and US Air will probably merge this year. If correct we will have 3 legacy airlines - Delta/US Air/United. Plus consider the business model for airports - build them and hope airlines come and stay. Because airlines don't sign long-term contracts to protect your investment.

needan

3:07 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Get a Federal & State grant instead of having Gwinnett county spend all $550M tax payers money. If grants are approved for 70-80% then county has less to spend. Keep in mind there is a return coming in the form of taxes and other forms of income from day 1 to the county when the airport starts operating which will offset the money spent by county slowly and later on faster.

Reply

needan

3:44 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Correction..

Distance from Briscoe Field Airport, Lawrenceville, GA - Dawsonville, GA

It is a 1 Hr drive and distance is 43 miles+ approx. (not 25). Basically, it is almost the same distance to Hartsfield. No traffic that is the only benefit. Having the 2nd airport in Dawsonville would that be practical or not? Personally, with this updated info, I do not think it is worthwhile. Gwinnett Briscoe is better or build an airport close to Briscoe focusing towards the north-west area to accomodate people from Alpharetta, Cumming, Buford area. Officials of gwinnett county should have brought another piece of land (1000 acres) 20-30 years back visualizing the need for a commercial airport. Now there are lot of resident homes and it is quite tough to buy that much land.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

3:56 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Airlines do not care about our convenience, they don't mind that we drive for a hour or two.

Brett Smith during a meeting with the Briscoe Citizens Committee conceded that Briscoe could not attract passenger from the west side of the Chattachoochie. That does not leave a high enough concentration of travellers to support a regional airport. You can't just fly 10 or 15 jets in a day, you have to have critical mass to support ground operations. The fact is that just not going to happen due to a number of factors - geograhic limitations, infrastructure cost, instablity of airline industry.

Gwinnett county hired three aviation consultants, all three said Briscoe had slim to no chance for success. Would you ignore the advise of professional, independent aviation experts? Also the FAA AMACS II study eliminated Briscoe as an alternative to ATL. Would you ignore the FAA recommendation also? The FAA is independent and has no reason to spin the results.

Jim Regan

3:44 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

The State doesn't have money for aviation grants and do we really think we can rely on the FAA to provide near unlimited funding for a second airport?

Income is not guaranteed from day one, again read about MidAmerica near St Louis and Branson MO privately built airport funded by CitiGroup. CitiGroup at one point was threatening foreclosure.

Reply

needan

4:10 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

But ATLANTA city is way bigger city than St. Louis and Branson. Let us compare apples to apples. Atlanta is situated geographically positioned great and is also the big capital city of South-Eastern united states. Compare with Florida, Tennessee, Alabama, South Carolina, North Carolina, Kentucky, Mississippi, Virginia. There is no other city like Atlanta in growth wise. Also, look at the job market, fortune companies, housing development and tourist attractions. This city is still growing in fast pace compared to any other cities in South East USA. If Briscoe is not ideal let us work out something that makes more sense and fits into the FAA AMAACS recommendation !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Regan

10:23 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

We have to look at airport capacity and utilization. I'm sure on paper MidAmerican and Branson both looked like homeruns. Reality not so much.

Remember 75% of passenger don't leave the Hartsfield terminal. What does that do the the necessity for another airport? If you build a regional airport your aren't going to pull pass thru passenger to a 2nd airport, your only going to attract local destination passengers. The experts said there aren't enough. We really don't want to lobby for or fund a 2nd airport if the likelihood for success isn't probable do we?

needan

5:40 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

That is the curse of Atlanta and the politicians/rulers who have not properly lined up the job market, very poor road net work, lack of proper mass transit, lack of not giving enough tax breaks for fortune companies to move to Georgia - eg. BMW, Mercedez Benz, Nissan, Honda to name a few of nice companies who wanted to open their biz. But the so called politicans and the ruling party did not study it properly and turned their backs against them. So what happened? They went to our neighboring states and were well received by the Governor, Mayors and the politicians who knew the value of every job and its growth consequences for a better economy.

There are a lot of other fortune companies who are not welcomed graciously in Georgia due to this politicians and the old mind set thinking of residents in Atlanta. There is no other place like ATLANTA in this country that is best suitable for jobs, housing, quality of life, tourism, weather, etc,. But who killed it and still killing? The politicians and the negative minded people who do not want modernization of Atlanta. If this city was in the hands of right people, Atlanta would have been the BIG APPLE of this country and not New York. That is the growth potential for this Atlanta but very sad to see this city going through. If this city had the right set up we would need one regional airport each in 4 sides of the city. No need to worry about the 75% of in transit passengers. We can just leave the Hartsfield for them!

Reply

Leave a comment